Angela Cardona - District 3

Name of Candidate:  Angela Cardona

Email:  voteacd3@gmail.com
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/AngelaforDistrict3/
Twitter: 

Score:  36.96% Bicycle Friendly 

Position running for: City Council District 3 

Question 1: "You're driving along and you encounter a person on a bicycle taking up the entire lane. What is your reaction?    

A, That's illegal and they should be riding on the sidewalk.    

B, Intimidate them so they will learn their place on the roadway.    

C, It's okay to hit them with your car, and it's their fault for being in the way.    

D, None of the above.    

Reason for answer: D. None of the above; a cyclist is allowed on the street as it is a mode of transportation, especially if in a designated lane.

Question 2: Running for Council: Will you as a Council Member focus on putting down a Protected Bicycle Lane on the busiest corridor in your district? And what is the busiest corridor in your district? 
Yes  
Comments:  Yes, Protect Bicycle Lanes are critical to protecting this mode of transportation. A designated lane would be ideal among the busiest corridors in this district; however, our streets are some of the oldest established in the City and would be difficult design complete streets, to include bike lanes. I would look at alternate routes along the greenway trail system that are better suited and parallel these busy corridors, such as Military Drive (Southeast to Southwest) and many others.    

Question 3:  How should the Linear Creekways be funded, and on which improvement to the Linear Creekway do you want the funds to be spent?   
Answer:  A mixed source of funding toward transportation along the creekways should continue to be considered. The improvements should happen that will connect the largest amount of people to places they work and go to school and integrate into their daily lives as viable ways to connect.   

Question 4:  "Do you support increased funds to expand and maintain VIA bus services and routes?"    
Yes
Reason for answer:  Yes, because the purpose of this mode of transportation in the future is to move large amounts of people with the least amount of cars on the roadways. Funding these services and routes will help to accomplish this.

Question 5:  "Should funding for more bicycle lanes and pedestrian safety education be included in the city's annual transportation budget?"   
Yes 
Reason for Answer:  Yes, funding should continue for bicycle lanes in the City transportation budget and the expansion of pedestrian safety education. 



Back to candidate list:   https://aatblog210.blogspot.com/p/bicycle-voters-guide-2021.html 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Propaganda that Makes Transportation Sucks / Part II - Why Transportation sucks in America

Image
In Part I , I talked about result of us having a transportation system designed for you to consume as much oil as possible. In this part, (Part II) I'll be focusing on the propaganda that convinces you that driving is the best thing since slice bread. This is about the propaganda that says it's great to be in a car and how are cars supposedly are better, but leaves out how much welfare is required for you to be able to drive your car. How much cost is required of you, the owner of the vehicle to maintain it. This is why public transportation sucks. So how did we get here? The War on Cars Starts :      This is a misnomer because it's in fact the other way around. There was never ever a war on cars. There is however a war on walking, a war on bicycling and a war against using transit. It started over a hundred years ago when GM purchased the New York Streetcar system and replace the streetcars with buses. The reason for this was because people in cities just weren't buyin
Read more

All Transportation Requires WELFARE, Always Has / Part III Why Transportation sucks in America

Update:  Virgin has since got out of the Brightline deal.  In Part I , I went over the results of us having the transportation built for you to consume as much oil as possible. In Part II , I pointed out how the propaganda is there to convince you that driving is the best thing since sliced bread. Now in Part III, I explain how all Transportation Requires Welfare for we as a society don't believe in this reality.  Like the title says, all transportation requires welfare and always has needed subsidies of some form or another. People don’t understand this nor want to understand that for the whole of civilization, all transportation requires some form of welfare. The reason why we don’t accept this reality is because we hold onto the myth that it’s the private sector’s job to provide transportation services which omits the fact that the infrastructure that the private sector uses to earn money on is built and paid for by governments. So how did we get here believing in the myt
Read more

The Consequences of our Transporation System/ Part I - Why Transportation Sucks in America

Image
Have you ever wondered why you have to drive a car to get around, why public transportation is unreliable and no matter what, your intercity travel options are either by car, Greyhound or flying with airlines who will cancel your flight on a whim . The answer is surprisingly simple; our transportation system is designed for you to have to consume as much oil as possible. If any other alternative to driving is presented to the public, political entities that are against the alternatives along with the local newspapers will tell you that nobody wants it, not enough people will use and they'll tell you that it will make your life a living nightmare when driving.  Now you're probably asking how did I come to the conclusion that our transportation system is designed to force you to consume as much oil as possible? Well it wasn't easy because there's no one out there pointing to the obvious. I came to this conclusion one cold morning riding the new Primo route 10
Read more